ChatGPT Spurs Fake Claims, Not Curbing It
2 min. read
Updated on
Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help MSPoweruser sustain the editorial team Read more
The New York Times revealed that ChatGPT, once praised for countering fake claims, now unintentionally boosts conspiracy content instead of fighting it.
Initial reports showed that when users asked ChatGPT to debunk false beliefs (e.g., moon-landing deniers), its replies reduced conspiracy acceptance in controlled studies. But more recent patterns show a shift. Coordinated efforts now exploit the AI, crafting prompts that twist responses to reinforce fringe ideas. These users collect and repurpose AI-generated text, often subtly misleading or incomplete—as evidence to support their narratives.
A new preprint study dated April 23, 2025, examined GPT 4o and found that its rebuttals often recycle partial facts or omit context; hallucinated details slip through and undermine its corrective impact. Meanwhile, adversarial prompting lets bad actors push through facile counterspeech crafted to look convincing, yet subtly preserve core conspiracy claims.
Other recent Tech news –
- OpenAI Opens Munich Office to Strengthen German Tech Ties
- Google Launches Its First Generative AI Certification for Non-Tech Professionals- Check Details Here
- This Is How Microsoft Store Has Become Better For You – All New Updates
Digital-ethics researchers warn that without stronger protections, AI systems like ChatGPT may become part of disinformation playbooks. Experts recommend adding stricter prompt filters, context checking, and clearer explanation of source reliability. Meanwhile, misinformation trackers are noting more ChatGPT-derived conspiratorial posts on forums and social feeds, these now outnumber legitimate fact-checking use cases.
This development comes amid renewed policy discussions around AI. Government regulators and platform designers are debating requirements for transparency and misuse prevention. The concern is clear: language models fill an increasingly visible role in public messaging, for better or worse. A growing faction urges stronger built-in safeguards, so AI doesn’t become a new tool for misleading millions.
In the end, ChatGPT’s changing role highlights a tough lesson: building advanced AI isn’t enough. Its impact hinges on how we choose to deploy, govern, and protect it.
You may also be interested to read –
User forum
0 messages