Did Qualcomm mislead with Snapdragon X Elite/Plus benchmarks?

Reading time icon 3 min. read

Readers help support MSpoweruser. We may get a commission if you buy through our links. Tooltip Icon

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help MSPoweruser sustain the editorial team Read more

snapdragon x elite-min

In the world of tech, where racing for top speed and efficiency in processors can often seem like a thrilling adventure story, Qualcomm has now faced a very direct spotlight. The accusations regarding benchmark cheating on its Snapdragon X Elite and Plus laptop processors have created turbulence, putting shade on what should have been an outstanding time for this big technology company. These processors were praised as Qualcomm’s opportunity to compete directly with Apple, Intel, and AMD. But they are now at the heart of a dispute that might harm their initial introduction.

The accusations from SemiAccurate.com hint that the benchmark results, which were shown by Qualcomm to the press and its OEM partners, might not be as truthful or feasible as they appear. The site claims that even top OEM developers find it hard to duplicate these outcomes – a possible indication of data manipulation for making Qualcomm’s new chips look better. Nevertheless, Qualcomm remains strong in their confidence about performance claims and is excitedly waiting for people’s reactions when devices are available on the market.

The drama continues with reports from OEMs stating that the performance numbers they were shown by Qualcomm at first were much higher than what they could achieve in real life. Some have even compared Snapdragon X Elite’s performance to Intel Celeron chips, showing a significant difference from the power Qualcomm had promised. This difference makes some people guess if best-tier OEMs cannot match up to similar levels as what is shown for reference by Qualcomm themselves, then there might be something wrong happening here.

Further enhancing the mystery, Qualcomm’s hesitancy to arrange intensive technical briefings or permit independent benchmarking before the chips are released has only deepened suspicion. Vows of profound technical knowledge and reviewers being able to test the new chips on their own have not been fulfilled yet, resulting in many unanswered queries.

While the tech community observes, it is still uncertain what the Snapdragon X Elite and Plus processors can truly do. As the Build developer conference of Microsoft approaches, people are hopeful for clear details about Windows on Arm’s future and resolve all accusations about Qualcomm’s newest products.

When these chips reach consumers and independent reviewers, reality shall be revealed. Will Snapdragon X Elite and Plus by Qualcomm meet their expectations? Or is it possible that they do not perform as well as the high standards established through their debated benchmarks?