DeepSeek R1 may soon become Perplexity's default model, raising daily limit to 500

DeepSeek R1 is just crazy good

Reading time icon 2 min. read


Readers help support MSpoweruser. We may get a commission if you buy through our links. Tooltip Icon

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help MSPoweruser sustain the editorial team Read more

Key notes

  • Perplexity is rapidly adopting DeepSeek R1 and may make it its default model.
  • Paid users now get 500 queries, while free users get 5 daily.
  • Microsoft is integrating DeepSeek R1, but it’s under investigation for possible OpenAI data misuse.
Try DeepSeek R1 on Perplexity

Perplexity, the popular AI-powered search engine, is moving fast in adopting the DeepSeek R1 model.

The company’s CEO, Aravind Srinivas, is considering making the open-source model Perplexity AI’s default model.

The company has previously added the open-source model to the search engine with a limit of 25 at its launch, and now, it’s adding up to even 500 for paid Perplexity Pro users. Free users can also try it, but only with 5 daily queries for the time being.

Unlike its original Chinese counterpart, DeepSeek R1 on Perplexity has been polished so it’s not heavily censored and is stored in the US instead. It is available on iOS, macOS, web, and Android.

The CEO also says that new reasoning models can make the native assistant on Android a whole lot better, especially for complex tasks. “We will make the native assistant on the phones (Android to begin with) accomplish tasks more reliably. And the Assistant will be free as long as you switch default from Google/Gemini,” he adds.

The arrival of DeepSeek caused a lot of anxiety in the US market, especially for its claims that it built the model using older Nvidia H100 GPUs and just $6 million. But, a lot of companies have started adopting it.

Microsoft has now said that it’s launching DeepSeek R1 to Copilot+ PCs and developers could try it on Azure AI & GitHub. Though, both Microsoft and OpenAI have been investigating whether the Chinese company improperly accessed OpenAI’s technology data through its API, which is a violation of OpenAI’s terms of service.

User forum

0 messages