AI Cracks Scent Code: Inside Osmo’s Race to Create Digital Fragrances

At a high-end lab on Manhattan’s waterfront, Osmo, a startup, converts real plum aromas into code. It delivers scent samples based on client prompts in just forty-eight hours, matching Amazon Prime’s delivery speed . That speed contrasts sharply with the traditional perfume process: perfumers typically test dozens of versions over weeks or months. They wait for each blend to mature before evaluating projection and dry-down. These steps, plus growing, bottling, and packaging, stretch a fragrance’s journey from idea to shelf to at least six months, often closer to eighteen.

Osmo claims this “digitized plum” process could redefine the industry. But early testers raised eyebrows. One described the scent as “too medicinal, too clean,” missing the natural bruised plum’s warm, corrosive edges. That prompted a deeper question: can code replicate craftsmanship?

The answer, industry experts say, is “not quite.” Major firms like Givaudan, DSM-Firmenich, IFF, and Symrise already use AI-enhanced tools such as Givaudan’s Carto and DSM-Firmenich’s EmotiON. Veterans like Frank Voelkl, the perfumer behind Santal 33 and Tom Ford Tuscan Leather, use AI to manage regulations, stability, and performance. That allows them to focus on human ingredients: emotion, intuition, and creativity.

Other recent AI news –

• Meta Considered Buying Perplexity Before Betting on Scale AI
• Google Rolls Out Gemini AI App to All Education Workspace Users For Free
• Character.AI Hires Meta’s Former Biz Exec to Lead the Chatbot Company into Its Next Phase

Consumer products already deliver AI?influenced scents. The big four fragrance producers rely on algorithmic assistance in labs and education, integrating it directly into formulation workflows. Still, AI can streamline design logistics and compliance, but it can’t feel the moment a plum breaks.

Beyond lab efficiency, this shift provokes industry reflection. Osmo sees mass customization and fast sample delivery as the next wave. Traditional perfumers see a ceremony in scent development. In public and private labs, fragrance designers debate how much AI should touch their art. When AI handles the grind, they argue, human emotion drives the chemistry.

Osmo’s plum experiment highlights a crossroads. Scent creators and consumers must ask: does fragrance stop being personal when it becomes programmable? Or can AI simply equip artisans to focus on what matters – nuance, balance, soul? The answer will shape what we smell next.

You may also be interested to read –

• Europe Calls Out US Tech After Microsoft Bars ICC Prosecutor’s Email
• The Latest UN Report Says, Global Trust in AI Splits as China Leads, West Drags Behind
• Undead Citadel Hits PS VR2 on June 26, This Is What It Brings