Microsoft accused of fake Microsoft SQ2 processor upgrade for Surface Pro X
3 min. read
Published on
Share this article
Improve this guide
Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help MSPoweruser sustain the editorial team Read more
In 2019 launched the Surface Pro X with the SQ1 processor, meant to be a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx processor specially adapted by Microsoft to run Windows 10 on ARM better.
As our readers know, this did not really close the performance gap with Intel processors, and in 2020 Microsoft launched a Surface Pro X update with the new SQ2 processor, meant to address the concerns.
German site DrWindows reports that their benchmarking however revealed no discernable difference between the “two” processors:
Browser benchmark Jetstream 2
- Surface Pro X 2019 with SQ1: 89,614
- Surface Pro X 2020 with SQ2: 90,664
Antutu benchmark
- Surface Pro X 2019 with SQ1: 286,740
- Surface Pro X 2020 with SQ2: 286,271
Geekbench 4
- Surface Pro X 2019 with SQ1: 3,530 (single core), 11,927 (multi core)
- Surface Pro X 2020 with SQ2: 3,627 (single core), 12,042 (multi core)
Today they called the processor upgrade a “fraudulent label” after Microsoft merged the firmware support for the two processors:
| Surface Pro X with SQ2 processor | ||
| Windows Update History Name | Device Manager Name | Version and Update |
| Microsoft Corporation – System Hardware Update | Qualcomm(R) Bus Device – System devices | 1.0.1220.0
|
| Qualcomm(R) Hexagon(TM) 690 DSP – System devices | 1.0.1260.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) Hexagon(TM) 690 DSP – System devices | 1.0.1260.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) System Manager Device – System devices | 1.0.1120.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) System Manager Device – System devices | 1.0.1160.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) System Manager Device – System devices | 1.0.1220.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) System Manager Device – System devices | 1.0.1280.0
|
|
| Qualcomm(R) USBC UCSI Participant – System devices | 2.9.139.0
|
|
| Surface Pro X Power Engine Plug-in Device – System devices | 1.0.1260.0
|
|
They noted that it is more likely that improvements in Windows 10 on ARM between 2019 and 2020 were responsible for any perceived improvements, and that these would be felt equally on both the old and new Surface Pro X.
It is fair to say Microsoft has not delivered on the promise of having its own processor, and it increasingly appears to have been more a marketing rather than technical move.
What do our readers think? Let us know in the comments below.
